Thomas Bach decided not to extend his IOC presidency emphasizing the need for new leadership and adherence to governance rules.
Olympic movement is on the cusp of change as President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Thomas Bach has announced his decision not to pursue an extension beyond the 12-year limit set by the organization's governance rules.
This revelation came during an emotionally charged speech on the penultimate day of the Paris Games marking a pivotal moment for the IOC and its leadership trajectory.
Bach, who has steered the IOC since September 2013, acknowledged the necessity for fresh leadership amid evolving global dynamics.
"New times are calling for new leaders," he expressed, his voice breaking with emotion as per Daily Mail.
The decision came against the backdrop of considerable speculation that Bach might seek to amend the Olympic Charter to extend his presidency.
This speculation had been fueled by requests from some IOC members for him to consider such a change.
However, Bach emphasized the importance of governance and credibility in his decision-making.
"In order to safeguard the credibility of the IOC we all, and in particular I as your president, have to respect the highest standards of good governance we have set for ourselves," he stated firmly.
Bach’s tenure has been notable for several reforms and initiatives aimed at modernizing the IOC and expanding its influence globally.
However, these efforts also placed him at the center of debates over the direction and integrity of the Olympic movement.
His leadership saw the IOC navigate through crises such as the Russian doping scandal and the complex dynamics of hosting the Games amid political tensions and a global pandemic.
The call for leadership change also reflects an understanding of the shifting geopolitical landscape, particularly the rise of emerging powers in the Global South.
Bach himself noted the need for someone who could build strong relations with these new influencers in the international arena.
Moreover, the composition of the IOC, which includes royalty, state leaders, and prominent figures from various sectors, adds layers of complexity to any decision regarding leadership changes.